Rossi (
deathpixie) wrote2009-06-18 10:48 am
Entry tags:
Food for Thought
Back when I was fifteen going on sixteen, I spent a year in Japan as an exchange student. It was, to use the cliche, a life-changing experience.
One of the things that stuck with me most was a conversation I had with one of the American students, who had done her year and was about to go home just as I arrived. We'd met up for lunch and she was giving me various tips on how to survive the year and in the course of things, I started blurting out, as I had a tendency to do back then, the whole sorry story of being ostracised and picked on at high school.
She looked at me and asked, without any kind of ill-feeling: "Why did you tell me all that?"
I was a bit non-plussed. "So that you'd know what awful things had happened, I suppose," I replied. "So you'd sympathise."
"But," she said. "Which would you prefer? Someone to be your friend, or someone to feel sorry for you?"
I didn't have an answer straight away, and we went on to other topics. But that conversation has stuck with me, all this time. And it's slowly shaped how I relate to people and react to them. Sympathy and someone feeling sorry for you is good - it validates your suffering, means that you'll always have someone there when you feel bad. But it's not a basis for a friendship. There's an inequality built in right from the start, one person perceived as being weaker than the other.
What would you prefer? A friend, or someone who felt sorry for you? I know which one I prefer, as hard as it can be sometimes.
One of the things that stuck with me most was a conversation I had with one of the American students, who had done her year and was about to go home just as I arrived. We'd met up for lunch and she was giving me various tips on how to survive the year and in the course of things, I started blurting out, as I had a tendency to do back then, the whole sorry story of being ostracised and picked on at high school.
She looked at me and asked, without any kind of ill-feeling: "Why did you tell me all that?"
I was a bit non-plussed. "So that you'd know what awful things had happened, I suppose," I replied. "So you'd sympathise."
"But," she said. "Which would you prefer? Someone to be your friend, or someone to feel sorry for you?"
I didn't have an answer straight away, and we went on to other topics. But that conversation has stuck with me, all this time. And it's slowly shaped how I relate to people and react to them. Sympathy and someone feeling sorry for you is good - it validates your suffering, means that you'll always have someone there when you feel bad. But it's not a basis for a friendship. There's an inequality built in right from the start, one person perceived as being weaker than the other.
What would you prefer? A friend, or someone who felt sorry for you? I know which one I prefer, as hard as it can be sometimes.

no subject
Stupid Catch-22.
no subject
no subject
But, I don't pour out whole sordid tales. I just refer to it as needed, say 'yeah, I had a hard time in school. Sucks' and move on. Which I think is the healthy way to look at the whole situation anyway. :)
no subject
A
no subject
I think the desire is to show somebody your bloody heart and the whole gnarly exposition of yourself is, in many cases, the desire to manipulate others' emotions in order to shape their actions. But sometimes it's a genuine appetite for human contact. My father once said that what most people in this world want more than anything is for someone to look them in the face while they talk about themselves. I think that's true-- and not because most people would sacrifice anything for allies & caretakers, even dignity, but because most people are hungry for connections. IE, they are lonely.
no subject