*shrug* It's intellectually lazy analysis, taking situations and viewing them through a rigidly predefined prism. Whether it's extreme feminism, neo-Marxist thought, radical religious extremes, any sort of code of thought which has no capacity for contextual analysis is by and large nothing but worthless pseudo-intellectual narcissism. She's an extreme wyman queer feminist, due to a self-professed rejection of men. As a result, the currency of her opinion is worthless because it is self-admittedly biased.
To use 'feminist' as a description is really not accurate, because her views are far to the extreme of mainstream feminism, like saying al-Quida represents Islam.
People driven by ideology have no capacity for context, which is by and large where truth and understanding exist. Pity them and ignore them, because you won't ever change them.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 08:24 pm (UTC)To use 'feminist' as a description is really not accurate, because her views are far to the extreme of mainstream feminism, like saying al-Quida represents Islam.
People driven by ideology have no capacity for context, which is by and large where truth and understanding exist. Pity them and ignore them, because you won't ever change them.