![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Funny how things travel in coincidences. Not a couple of days after a conversation with a friend about the way women are viewed as manipulative and somehow evil, Joss Whedon shares his thoughts.
I'm not entirely sure of the Womb Envy theory - my presonal theory is that it's a function of fear, of men in general (not any one specific man or group of men) being afraid of the impact women have on them, on their behaviour and the control they can weild through sex that leads to the 'evil' tag, but again, that's just a vague opinion and nothing to do with any of the actual men I know (with a couple of exceptions). It's something to think about, any way, the fact that 50% of the population is not only targeted as weak and morally reprehensible, but that that 50% also buys into it.
The article also raises for me the question of the power of the modern media in our society, and whether, with the glut of reality TV, we've become so used to viewing things as part of a giant television show or movie or game, that we don't stop to considering the actual reality of it. The empathy of it.
Heavy thinking before heading off for the traditional May 2-4 BBQ, this time at Johnny's place where we don't have to get caught in the rain. I'll leave you to it.
I'm not entirely sure of the Womb Envy theory - my presonal theory is that it's a function of fear, of men in general (not any one specific man or group of men) being afraid of the impact women have on them, on their behaviour and the control they can weild through sex that leads to the 'evil' tag, but again, that's just a vague opinion and nothing to do with any of the actual men I know (with a couple of exceptions). It's something to think about, any way, the fact that 50% of the population is not only targeted as weak and morally reprehensible, but that that 50% also buys into it.
The article also raises for me the question of the power of the modern media in our society, and whether, with the glut of reality TV, we've become so used to viewing things as part of a giant television show or movie or game, that we don't stop to considering the actual reality of it. The empathy of it.
Heavy thinking before heading off for the traditional May 2-4 BBQ, this time at Johnny's place where we don't have to get caught in the rain. I'll leave you to it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 05:34 pm (UTC)Dude, you just described yourself as a liberal feminist with a mild postmodern streak. :) I have to run (literally run) to work just now, but I absolutely hate the stigmatization of the word 'feminist' as some kind of man-hating bitch who doesn't care about anything but ousting men from power. I actually agree with you - you're about where I am, politically speaking, there - but that perception of feminism is a gross misrepresentation of what feminism is, and since it comes from everyone's favourite neo-conservatives (Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan, Rush Limbaugh, etc, etc) I feel... kinda obliged to say something. Feminists believe that gender is a legitimate lens through which to view inequalities in society. From there, they start to differ, and yes, some of them believe pretty crazy things, but a majority of them? Not so much. They'd almost unanimously agree with you that other divisions are legitimate and appropriate, even if that's not what they can look at without generalizing too much (my academic bent comes out here).
(Sorry to be nitpicky in your journal. It's not personal, I swear. Just one of those sore points for me, and I know it's kinda rude to say so, and I don't mean it badly or ANYTHING, but it makes me really sad to see it.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 06:34 pm (UTC)People like Germaine Greer come up in the mainstream (conservative) media to discredit reasonable feminists, IMO. And that media succeeds, because yeah, some people are crazy. But do we automatically assume that Rush Limbaugh speaks for all conservatives, or that Michael Moore speaks for all liberals?
(Sorry. SORRY. This makes me foam at the mouth and that's totally obvious - maybe I am one of the crazy feminists after all. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:21 am (UTC)If feminist means fighting for equalitity and for people to be treated with respect no matter what gender,social status or anything else they are, then I'm a feminist. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 12:56 am (UTC)(Seriously, I can be a loser sometimes. I shouldn't've ranted at you.)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 05:21 am (UTC)But hon, you know I respect you. And like I said, we do agree. I just flew off the handle a little. The feminist label's one that I feel really strongly about, but I've had the benefit of really involving myself in what it means and what it is (and can be, and isn't).
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:25 am (UTC)It's very confusing ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-21 06:25 pm (UTC)I think everyone has their own talents and skill set. There's no need for the whole 'I'm better then you' stuff that goes on sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 01:19 am (UTC)I have never been of the belief that being a feminist means that I think that women are better than men (and so not going into genitalia, medically that's more complicated that I want to mention) just that it meant that women aren't worse. As a result of this I wonder why it is that women get paid less, are the social givers of EEEVIL! aka sexuality, and have all of that other cultural baggage.
Being feminist has not, as far as I can figure or have experienced, meant that I am blind to other forms of discrimination, and that I have used up my "But why are there differences in how these two groups of people are treated" quota. I didn't even know there was a quota. Why can't I be a feminist and liberal, gay-rights, environmentalist, inclusionist, human/civil rights advocating person?
And to Rossi: How can you look at all human equality without looking at gender? Sure, and also looking at *spits* race (I hate that word, my inner scientist gets grumpy when I use it), language, age, abilities and disabilities, sexuality, physical and social groups.
You know I'm not angry at you guys, but I get so tired of seeing the fact that it is culturally unacceptable for women to be feminist. Let alone men. It's insane that it's considered risque for straight men to call themselves feminist. Frankly I consider that a sign that more people should be.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 02:57 am (UTC)...
You should come and visit and not run over my cat.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 11:51 am (UTC)Who's been yelling? My life is one of low level atmospheric bitching and moaning. Not just by me, if you can believe it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 06:23 am (UTC)In some cases, it's picking battles. I'm tired of having to explain what version of feminism I mean when I say "I'm a feminist."
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 06:34 am (UTC)Also, I'm a bit of a reclaim the language kinda person. It doesn't come up often, but if it does then I say a quick "I like earning money and not having to give up my job if I get preggers, how about you?"
Maybe I deal with non-argumentative people more. Others have mentioned that they've had people tell them that feminists have made things worse. Which makes me cry.